Documentary
Requirements
1.
In terms of Section 43E of the South African Patents Act, commencement
of the PCT National Phase must take place before the expiration of 31
months from the priority date regardless whether a Chapter II demand
was filed as long as South Africa is elected. The applicant in respect
of an international application designating or electing the Republic
shall-
(a) pay the prescribed national fee to the patent office; and
(b) if the international application has not been lodged or published
in terms of the Patent Cooperation Treaty in English, lodge at the patent
office within the prescribed period (viz. 31 months from the priority
date) a translation of the international application, containing the
prescribed contents, in an official language of the Republic. (English
is an official language)
A
maximum three month extension is possible for the lodging of the translation
and if the applicant does not provide the verified translation of the
application within 3 months of entering the national phase the international
application concerned shall be deemed to have been abandoned.
The
Patent Office may accept late lodging of the translation after the three
month extension period but we believe this to be irregular thereby making
the patent vulnerable to attack in the Court of the Commissioner of
Patent once the patent granted.
2.
The Registrar also requires satisfactory evidence that the applicant
is entitled to apply for the South African patent, and to this end the
standard Assignment is acceptable, although other means of satisfying
the Registrar, such as excerpts from employment contracts and Affidavits
by employers are also acceptable. This document may be filed within
6 months of the filing date.
3.
A Power of Attorney, on South African Patents Form P3 (the standard
Declaration and Power of Attorney), is also required to be lodged within
6 months of the filing date although extensions of this period are available.
4.
A Statement on the Use of Indigenous Biological Resource, Genetic Resource,
Traditional Knowledge or Use on South African Patents Form P26 is also
required to be lodged within 6 months of the filing date although extensions
of this period are available. We believe this to be limited to South
African resources, knowledge or use.
5.
Where the Form P26 contains a statement that the invention for which
protection is claimed is based on or derived from an indigenous biological
resource, a genetic resource, or traditional knowledge or use, the applicant
shall, before acceptance of the application furnish the registrar with
proof of his or her title or authority to make use of the indigenous
biological resource, the genetic resource, or the traditional knowledge
or use, by lodging with the registrar one or more of the following:
(a) a copy of the permit issued in terms of Chapter 7 of the National
Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004;
(b) if applicable, proof that prior consent had been obtained as contemplated
in section 82(2)(a) or 82(3)(a) of the National Environmental Management:
Biodiversity Act, 2004;
(c)
if applicable, proof of a material transfer agreement as contemplated
in section 82(2)(b)(i) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity
Act, 2004;
(d)
if applicable, proof of a benefit-sharing agreement as contemplated
in section 82(2)(b) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity
Act, 2004;
(e) if applicable, proof of co-ownership of the invention for which
protection is claimed;
(f)
any other proof to the satisfaction of the registrar.
Notes
on 2 to 5 above: ASSIGNMENTS
Please do not alter any assignment forms which we have provided for
signature or use your own forms without first confirming with us that
your forms would be suitable for filing in South Africa.
Please
ensure that the effective date of the Assignment of Invention is prior
to the date of signature of the patent forms P3 (Power of Attorney
and Declaration) and P26 (Declaration as to Indigenous Knowledge or
Resources).
In the
event that the priority application was filed in the name of an applicant
other than the applicant appearing on the WO publication, please let
us know as an Assignment of Priority will be required.
Where there
are two co-applicants and the employees of each co-applicant have
contributed parts of the invention as claimed, a cross assignment
by all of the inventors to both co-applicants is required. It is not
sufficient that the employees of a co-applicant only assign their
invention to that co-applicant because under South African law each
co-applicant owns an undivided share in the invention.
FORM
P26
Please
be advised that the Form P26 is required for all the inventions filed
in South Africa regardless of technical area to which an invention
belongs.
In the
event that the invention is NOT based on or derived from a South African
indigenous biological resource or genetic resource, please cross out
3(a), 4(a) and 5(a).
In the
event that the invention IS based on or derived from a South African
indigenous biological resource or genetic resource, please cross out
3(b), 4(b) and 5(b).
The meaning
of "the invention for which protection is claimed is based on or derived
from traditional knowledge or use" is that such traditional knowledge
or use is claimed as an essential element of the invention.
Specification
Requirements
6.
The South African Patent Office will obtain a copy of the International
Application, with Article 19 and Article 34 amendments directly from
WIPO and copies of the specification, claims, drawings, and abstract
are not receivable from the applicant.
7.
Where either or both Article 19 and Article 34 amendments have been
made during the International Phase, then such amendments will automatically
form part of the South African application, however where said amendments
were not made in English then a verified translation thereof into English
must be provided within 3 months.
8.
South Africa is a non-examining country and thus the only examination
is to form and not as to substance. It is the duty of the applicant
to ensure that the application is valid as to novelty and inventive
step.
8.1 South
Africa's novelty requirements are very similar to those of most of the
developed world including Europe, Australia, USA and Japan, and thus
any amendments made to overcome novelty objections before these examining
offices should be incorporated into the South African application, preferably
prior to grant of the patent.
8.2 South
Africa's inventive step requirements differ from some of the above jurisdictions
and thus a South African application should be scrutinised in the light
of the International Search Report and/or the International Preliminary
Examination Report to decide to what extent the PCT International Specification
as filed and/or as published should be amended when filing a South African
application to reduce the risk of invalidity on the grounds of lack
of inventive step of any South African patent which may be granted on
the application.
8.3 We usually
recommend that amendments made before examining offices solely to overcome
inventive step objections are considered carefully before being incorporated
in the South African application. This course of action prevents the
unnecessary limitation of the scope of the claims of the South African
patent. Only a court can decide on the question of inventive step.
8.4 It may
thus in some instances be preferable not to be limited by the amendments
annexed to the International Preliminary Examination Report but rather
to selectivley amend the South African patent application prior to acceptance
of the patent. This can be undertaken at the same time as the omnibus
claims are added (see 9. below) by amending the application to reverse
the amendments made during the International Phase, where possible.
8.5 In terms
of South African patent practice, omnibus claims are usually included
in a South African application prior to grant of the patent. These omnibus
claims must be introduced by way of amendment as set out in 9. below.